The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: question on definitions
Replies: 3   Last Post: Aug 4, 2013 9:48 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 424
Registered: 1/4/06
Re: question on definitions
Posted: Aug 4, 2013 4:16 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sunday, 4 August 2013 19:54:49 UTC+1, G Patel wrote:
> Let f be a function defined on an open interval of x. Now/then,
> f is said to be continuous at x if/iff some predicate P(f,x) is true.
> is this equivalent to? :
> f is said to be continuous at x if/iff f is a function defined
> on an open interval of x and some predicate P(f,x) is true.
> That is, when the first statement is made ahead of the definition
> proper, how do we interpret it? If some point does not meet the initial
> statement, are we allowed to call the function "discontinuous" at that point?

I don't think so. In your example, if f is NOT a function so defined,
the property of it being continuous or discontinuous may be meaningless.

Consider: if N is an integer, it is said to be prime if ... (usual
definition). Well, when N is not an integer, it is meaningless to
discuss whether it is prime or not prime; it is neither.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.