
Re: A finite set of all naturals
Posted:
Aug 24, 2013 2:18 AM


Nam Nguyen wrote:
> >> It your claim about the truth value of cGC about expressions in some >> particular language? If so, which language? > > Not that I didn't let people know the language cGC is written in > _multiple of times_
So that's one language (which elsewhere was (+,*,S,<,0) from Shoenfield page 22, I think). Why do you need another?
> what does your question here have to do with the > issue that odd(x) can't be expressed positively in L(0,<,*),
Prove that odd(x) can't be expressed positively in L(0,<,*), begin by defining "expressed positively".
> which you > have not acknowledged, or have not been able to acknowledge? >
 Sorrow in all lands, and grievous omens. Great anger in the dragon of the hills, And silent now the earth's green oracles That will not speak again of innocence. David Sutton  Geomancies

