The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: (infinity) A real story
Replies: 16   Last Post: Oct 15, 2013 3:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: (infinity) A real story
Posted: Oct 14, 2013 3:42 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Monday, 14 October 2013 00:11:23 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:

> > > If you claim that infinitely many enumerated lines are required, then
> > > name the first line number required.

> > While no particular line is neccessary, neither is any finite set of lines
> > sufficient, but any and every infinite set of lines is sufficient and the
> > infiniteness of a set of lines is necessary.

> > According to mathematics, every nonempty > subset of natural numbers has a
> > first element. This also holds for infinite > subsets.

> > Something true from WM.
> Then obey it! Your "any and every infinite set of lines is sufficient" is
> simply nonsense.

It may be nonsense inside of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology, but
it is both sense and true everywhere else.

> You must give a smallest line required.

Tou must prove that there is as smallest line reequired, but there isn't.

The set of odd numbered lines suffices, but so does the set of even
numbered lines. Since these two sets of lines have no lines in common,
there can be no particular line that is required, and thus no particular
smallest line that is required, thus obviously proving WM's claims to
the contrary to be trivially and totally false.

> But as long as the
> lines are finite, it is impossible that two or more lines contain more than
> one of the lines.

But it is possible, and is the fact, that any and every infinite set of
lines contains every natural in WM's diagram, but no finite set of lines
does so.

Thus once again, WM's wild claims are shown to be false, or at least
false everywhere outside of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.