On Saturday, 8 March 2014 20:47:46 UTC+2, Spac...@hotmail.com wrote: > so, when are you going to produce a new, better results? > > > > personally, I don't see how one could get Brun's constant > > with some arbitrary finitude (a l'Avacado's numbeR, since > > it would then be rational, but it really in the icosahedron > > > > > There is a difference. Right way and wrong way. My way is the right way - the only right way.
You can't get the constant in any way, because it's NOT a constant. So why are you carrying on about this in every comment?