The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Two Finite Arithmetics
Replies: 19   Last Post: Apr 9, 2014 9:27 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Dan Christensen

Posts: 8,219
Registered: 7/9/08
Re: Two Finite Arithmetics
Posted: Apr 7, 2014 12:50 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sunday, April 6, 2014 4:54:57 AM UTC-4, William Elliot wrote:
> Naive Finite Arithmetic
>
> Let N be a set, 0,m two elements and S|N -> N a function.
>
> Axioms for naive finite arithmetic:
>
>
>
> 0, m in N; Sm = m
>
> for all x, Sx in N
>
> for all x, x /= S0
>
> for all x,y /= m. (Sx = Sy implies x = y)
>
>
>
> For all A subset N, if
>
> 0 in A, (for all x in A implies Sx in A)
>
> then N subset A
>
>
>
> Definition of addition by induction.
>
> 0 + y = y
>
> Definition of mulplication by induction.
>
> 0 * y = 0
>
> Sx * y = x*y + y
>
> Sx + y = x + Sy
>
>
>
> Is this a consistent set of axioms with the model of a finite
>
> set of integerss { 0,1,.. m } and addition defined by
>
> a + b = max{ m, a+b }?
>


This assumes addition on infinite N.

Also, if m+1=m and m+2=m, then m+1=m+2 and 1=2.

Dan
Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my new math blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.