Date: Nov 11, 2017 12:24 PM
Author: zelos.malum@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Frege - an idiot in every sense of  the word.

Den lördag 11 november 2017 kl. 10:29:01 UTC+1 skrev John Gabriel:
> On Friday, 10 November 2017 23:22:17 UTC-5, Zelos Malum wrote:
> > Den lördag 11 november 2017 kl. 02:43:41 UTC+1 skrev John Gabriel:
> > > Wiki: Frege argues that numbers are objects and assert something about a concept.
> > >
> > > Of course! A number is the measure of a magnitude.
> > >
> > > Wiki: Frege defines numbers as extensions of concepts.
> > >
> > > Correct! The concept of measure.
> > >
> > > Wiki: 'The number of F's' is defined as the extension of the concept G is a concept that is equinumerous to F.
> > >
> > > What an idiot! "Equinumerous" which requires that number already be established. Frege was laying the foundations for the bullshit of circular theory that was later produced by ultra-morons such as Peano and von Neumann.
> > >
> > > Wiki: The concept in question leads to an equivalence class of all concepts that have the number of F (including F).
> > >
> > > Oh dear! What the fuck is a number?!! Chuckle. Very Peano-esque.
> > >
> > > Wiki: Frege defines 0 as the extension of the concept being non self-identical.
> > >
> > > Poor guy was a fucking moron like most of you!
> > >
> > > Wiki: So, the number of this concept is the extension of the concept of all concepts that have no objects falling under them.
> > >
> > > WTF???!!!
> > >
> > > The bogus mainstream foundations were strongly influenced by fuckwads such as Frege.

> >
> > Your idea of "measure of magnitude" is not the definition so who cares what you think?

>
> It is the ONLY definition. There is no other. But I can't take credit for it because the idea was first realised by my brilliant ancestors.


It isn't, you can cry and moan like a child as much as you want. But it is not the definition.