Date: Oct 19, 2012 4:35 AM
Author: GS Chandy
Subject: Re: Jo Boaler reveals attacks by Milgram and Bishop

So, in the Jo Boaler issue in question, is Jo Boaler the good guy and are James Milgram and Wayne Bishop the bad guys?  OR: 

Is it the other way around - Jo Boaler the bad guy and James Milgram and Wayne Bishop the good guys?

In my view (after having read, fairly carefully, the 30+messages in this thread), the result is a stalemate:

The pro-Jo Boaler people have become yet more confirmed in their opinion that Jo Boaler is the good guy; as have the pro-J. Milgram + W. Bishop people been firmly confirmed in their contrary opinion that J. Milgram + W. Bishop are the good guys!

And there it stands.

Just observing.

GSC
("Still Shoveling Away!")

MPG had posted Oct 13, 2012 3:59 PM:
>
> http://www.stanford.edu/~joboaler/
>
> http://www.stanford.edu/~joboaler/Jo-Boaler-reveals-at
> tacks-by-Milgram-and-Bishop.pdf
>
>
> When Academic Disagreement Becomes Harassment and
> Persecution.
> by Dr Jo Boaler