Date: Nov 12, 2012 3:22 PM
Author: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Subject: Re: Cantor's first proof in DETAILS
In <k7rehn$rci$1@dont-email.me>, on 11/12/2012

at 06:18 PM, "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> said:

>In Cantor's proof a_{i+1} and b_{i+1} are the two first entries

>encountered (in any order) in (x_n) *after* the entries

>corresponding to a_i and b_i. This does not seem to be the case

>with your proof, where it instead seems that entries are just

>picked every time restarting from the beginning of (x_n).

Things equal to the same thing are equal to each other.

>Could you clarify?

Yes.

--

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the

right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to

domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not

reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org