Date: Dec 7, 2012 12:49 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 170

On 6 Dez., 21:29, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <a70f6b2c-c9a2-426d-9da4-70ad9785b...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
>
>  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > On 6 Dez., 11:07, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Two *sides* with an angle defined by these sides define a triangle.
>
> > > Not unless both sides have endpoints other than the one they share.
> > > And in WM's whatever-it-is, neither side has one.

>
> > It is not enough that all points are present?
>
> It would be, but the critical ones aren't!


How can the critical points be missing if *all* pojnts are thereß
>
>
>

> > > > We have one side of lenght 1*aleph_0 and the other side of length
> > > > sqrt(2)* aleph_0.

>
> > > Aleph_0 may be either an ordinality or a cardinality, dependent on
> > > usage, but is never a "length".

>
> > A unit lenght 1 times aleph_0 is what?
>
> Nonsense!


A unit times aleph_0 is aleph_0. But I agree. It is really nonsense.

Regards, WM