Date: Dec 7, 2012 12:49 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 170
On 6 Dez., 21:29, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> In article

> <a70f6b2c-c9a2-426d-9da4-70ad9785b...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,

>

> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > On 6 Dez., 11:07, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

>

> > > > Two *sides* with an angle defined by these sides define a triangle.

>

> > > Not unless both sides have endpoints other than the one they share.

> > > And in WM's whatever-it-is, neither side has one.

>

> > It is not enough that all points are present?

>

> It would be, but the critical ones aren't!

How can the critical points be missing if *all* pojnts are thereß

>

>

>

> > > > We have one side of lenght 1*aleph_0 and the other side of length

> > > > sqrt(2)* aleph_0.

>

> > > Aleph_0 may be either an ordinality or a cardinality, dependent on

> > > usage, but is never a "length".

>

> > A unit lenght 1 times aleph_0 is what?

>

> Nonsense!

A unit times aleph_0 is aleph_0. But I agree. It is really nonsense.

Regards, WM