Date: Dec 27, 2012 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: Distinguishability of paths of the Infinite Binary tree???

On 27 Dez., 12:31, gus gassmann <> wrote:
> On 26/12/2012 5:03 PM, fom wrote:

> >  WM is an empiricist.
> WM is a fool. An arrogant, blustering, uneducable fool.

Then try to educate at least the other members of this group: How can
they define more than countably many infinite paths of the CIBT by
means of nodes? Remember, Cantor is said to have proved uncountability
my means of *digits at finite indices* - by asserting that there must
be some more reals than can be counted. But that is the way how his
great followers, like Virgil and you an Samsung, put the argument

Regards, WM