Date: Dec 27, 2012 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: Distinguishability of paths of the Infinite Binary tree???
On 27 Dez., 12:31, gus gassmann <g...@nospam.com> wrote:
> On 26/12/2012 5:03 PM, fom wrote:
> > WM is an empiricist.
> WM is a fool. An arrogant, blustering, uneducable fool.
Then try to educate at least the other members of this group: How can
they define more than countably many infinite paths of the CIBT by
means of nodes? Remember, Cantor is said to have proved uncountability
my means of *digits at finite indices* - by asserting that there must
be some more reals than can be counted. But that is the way how his
great followers, like Virgil and you an Samsung, put the argument