Date: Dec 28, 2012 10:14 PM
Author: kirby urner
Subject: Re: An Interesting Way To Introduce Prime Numbers

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Ken Abbott <> wrote:

Yes, well described.

In practice it's not always easy to determine which prime factors make
N, so one successively tries those on file.

Like when you asked about 15, 2 doesn't work so we know to try 3, but
sometimes it's not obvious with which odd prime to start, so one plows
through the ones on file in succession, up to sqrt(N), at which point
one should have found one if there is one. If not, add to the stash
and proceed.

Put another way, factoring is a non-trivial problem and once the
integers get big enough, we run out of memory and/or time given
present capacity.

Which is not to denigrate your algorithm. The algorithms giving us
primes of many thousands of digits tend to shoot for "probable primes"
which means very very unlikely to be composite. Composites sneak
through the filters.

Like remember the Carmichael numbers: they pass all the Fermat tests
suggesting they're prime, but they're not:

Your method has often been implemented and is well respected. It
requires a growing stash of primes on file.