Date: Jan 17, 2013 11:38 AM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: WMatheology § 191
On 1/17/2013 4:52 AM, WM wrote:

> On 17 Jan., 08:42, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:

>

>> In a similar way it seems to be

>> impossible for Mückenheim to grasp something actually (not in the

>> always-growing sense) countably infinite without a boundary at the far end.

>

> Not at all! I consider and vivdly imagine the actually infinite set of

> all terminating decimal representations of the reals containg all

> natural numbers as indices. Alas I cannot imagine that there is

> another decimal representations of the reals which deviates from all

> of them. Can you?

Then, do irrational numbers exist

transiently on a problem by problem

basis? (Vacuum energy numbers)