```Date: Jan 25, 2013 2:45 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: ZFC and God

On 25 Jan., 01:23, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:> In article> <1bff3260-2afe-4cb5-b296-cbfcd9313...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,>>  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> > On 24 Jan., 21:43, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:>> > > > > U_n {1,...,n} is not infinite. (*)>> > > > It is not actually infinite. The cardinality is not larger than every> > > > n.>> > > Then there must be some n that it is not larger than.>> > > Either>> > There can be every n. Because no n is infinite!>> If there can be "every n", then there can be set containing "every n".There can be the set of all terminating decimal fractions (0. d_1,d_2, ..., d_n), containing every n as the last digit, is a set withoutnon-terminating decimal fraction, isn't it?>>>> > What is actually infinite is something that has *no* last n, if I> > remember correctly what you have said.>> You have not!>> That only would apply to ordered sets, like |Nyou mean the indices of digits of decimal fractions?Regards, WM
```