Date: Jan 25, 2013 6:57 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: ZFC and God

In article 
<35899e09-d829-490e-b608-a2ebd18b6490@u20g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 25 Jan., 19:58, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <23c75ce4-2ede-43e1-87d2-a61866fe1...@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > > On 25 Jan., 01:23, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <1bff3260-2afe-4cb5-b296-cbfcd9313...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,

> >
> > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > > On 24 Jan., 21:43, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > U_n {1,...,n} is not infinite. (*)
> >
> > > > > > > It is not actually infinite. The cardinality is not larger than
> > > > > > > every
> > > > > > > n.

> >
> > > > > > Then there must be some n that it is not larger than.
> >
> > > > > > Either
> >
> > > > > There can be every n. Because no n is infinite!
> >
> > > > If there can be "every n", then there can be set containing "every n".
> >
> > > There can be the set of all terminating decimal fractions (0. d_1,
> > > d_2, ..., d_n), containing every n as the last digit, is a set without
> > > non-terminating decimal fraction, isn't it?

> >
> > How would the existence of such a set prevent the existence of a set of
> > all decimals between 0 and 1?

>
> That is not our question and not our problem.


It is our question, and until WM can answer it successfully, WM's
claimed restrictions are irrelevant outside Wolkenmuekenheim .
--