Date: Jan 26, 2013 4:11 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: WMatheology § 200
On 26 Jan., 09:31, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> In article

> <0d063360-6dc5-4990-ba73-0400ce6c1...@w8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,

>

> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > Matheology 200

>

> > We know that the real numbers of set theory are very different from

> > the real numbers of analysis, at least most of them, because we cannot

> > use them. But it seems, that also the natural numbers of analysis 1,

> > 2, 3, ... are different from the cardinal numbers 1, 2, 3, ...

>

> The natural numbers of analysis are members of the set of real numbers,

Here I know of a difference: The collection of real numbers in

analysis is countable and is therefore not the a of set theory.

> but cardinal numbers are not members of the set of real numbers.

Here I don't know of a difference in the finite domain. Can you help?

Regards, WM