Date: Jan 30, 2013 3:28 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 203

On 30 Jan., 00:16, William Hughes <> wrote:
> On Jan 29, 10:11 pm, WM <> wrote:

> > On 29 Jan., 21:28, William Hughes <> wrote:
> <snip>

> > > It does, however, imply that d in not one
> > > of the lines of the list L

> > For that sake you must check all lines. Can you check what is not
> > existing?

> So now your claim is
> We can know
>   There does not exist a natural number n
>   such that d is equal to the nth line
>   of L
> but we cannot know
>   d is not one of the lines of L

You are trying hard to misunderstand!

For a potentially infinite set L we can know: d is not in line number
But a potentially infinite set is not actually infinite. And without
actually infinite sets, you have no uncountability. For instance, all
finite subsets of |N make up a countable power set. Only the actually
infinite subsets make up an uncountable power set. But "actually
infinite" means a number larger than every n. It is easy to understand
that this number can never be exhausted by finite numbers n. Therefore
we cannot prove that d is missing in the actually infinity list from
"for every n in |N, there is no line n that contains d".

We will never know something for all lines as we will never be able to
know all lines, since beyond every line n there are infinitely many

Regards, WM