Date: Jan 30, 2013 11:36 PM
Author: Porky Pig Jr
Subject: Re: The 11 Most Beautiful Mathematical Equations
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 6:05:38 AM UTC-5, Tom Potter wrote:

> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote in message

>

> news:R_-dnfVPcI-TNJXMnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@giganews.com...

>

> > The 11 Most Beautiful Mathematical Equations

>

> >> http://www.livescience.com/26680-greatest-mathematical-equations.html

>

>

>

> It's pretty obvious that the author of that article is not up to date

>

> as he did not include the three most beautiful leading edge equations.

>

>

>

> Potter's Law: x = e^(i^n * m*pi) = e^(i^n * (i^n *

>

> k))

>

> ( Modification Euler's Formula e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 to model being and

>

> becoming.)

>

>

>

> Trebert's Law: G=EMC^2

>

> ( G / c^2 = energy1 * energy2) ( The Pope doesn't like this expression.)

>

> ( Modification of Newton's and Einstein's Laws to put God and G into the

>

> picture.)

>

>

>

> Archimedes Plutonium Law: V = i * (I" cos^2(A)) = I * R

>

> ( Modification of Ohm's Law taking Malus's law into account to model

>

> conductivity. )

>

>

>

> And where is hanson's equation that models oscillators in a gravity field?

>

>

>

> I might mention that Trebert's Law seems to be flawed as

>

> it implies that the product of the energy of any two bodies

>

> is always equal to the constant ( G / c^2 )

>

>

>

> but note that hanson's equation is simplier and

>

> works better the Relativity,

>

>

>

> Archimedes Plutonium may be on to something big,

>

>

>

> and Potter's Law is a bullet proof model

>

> of being and becoming.

>

>

>

> --

>

> Tom Potter

>

> http://tom-potter.tel

>

> https://tdp1001.jux.com

>

> http://warp-to.us

>

> http://the-cloud-machine.tk

Too much time on your hands, dude? Oh, the joy of retirement!