Date: Feb 2, 2013 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 203
WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 2 Feb., 11:17, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > Ok. So, you are introducing the kind of arguments
> > used by Wittgenstein. Of course, Wittgenstein never
> > gave a coherent explanation for classical mathematics.
> Neither did ZFC.
The difference being that ZFC was not trying to.
> > His criticisms, however, are easily seen to be forebears
> > of much of the discrete mathematics that has become
> > so important with the advent of computing technology.
> Mathematical discourse is impossible without the means of
> communication that are available in phyical reality.
It is a shame then that WM is so incompetent at using them.