Date: Feb 7, 2013 9:21 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Feb 7, 3:05 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 7 Feb., 14:44, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 2:32 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > I do not agree that <snip> ~6
> > > follows from 3.
> > Nor does anyone else.
> Then d is not actually infinite.
Nope, that does not follow. 6 just says that
all FISONS of d are terminating
It does not say d is terminating.
Even though every FISON of
d terminates and d does not contain
anything but FISONS, WM has pointed
out that d is not a line of the list.