Date: Feb 9, 2013 10:57 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 9 Feb., 16:01, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Feb 9, 11:59 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> > On 9 Feb., 00:49, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > On Feb 8, 11:38 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > > On 8 Feb., 23:26, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> More WM logic

>

> > > > > L is a potentially infinite

> > > > > list and d is the potentially infinite

> > > > > anti-diagonal

>

> > > > > From

> > > > > i. For every natural number n, d

> > > > > is not the nth line of L

>

> > > > correct.

>

> > > > > ii. i. implies that there is no

> > > > > natural number m such that

> > > > > d is the mth line of L

>

> > > > No such m can be fixed.

>

> > > Your claim is that no such m exists.-

>

> > You argue

>

> Nope, the arguments are yours

> and the statements are yours-

Of course. But the wrong interpretation is yours.

Regards, WM