Date: Feb 9, 2013 10:57 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 9 Feb., 16:01, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 9, 11:59 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

> > On 9 Feb., 00:49, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 8, 11:38 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > > On 8 Feb., 23:26, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> More WM logic
>
> > > > > L is a potentially infinite
> > > > > list and d is the potentially infinite
> > > > > anti-diagonal

>
> > > > > From
> > > > >     i.  For every natural number n, d
> > > > >         is not the nth line of L

>
> > > > correct.
>
> > > > >     ii. i. implies that there is no
> > > > >         natural number m such that
> > > > >         d is the mth line of L

>
> > > > No such m can be fixed.
>
> > > Your claim is that no such m exists.-
>
> > You argue
>
> Nope, the arguments are yours
> and the statements are yours-


Of course. But the wrong interpretation is yours.

Regards, WM