Date: Feb 10, 2013 1:10 AM Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Subject: how much better physics would be with Axiom set -- Maxwell Equations<br> #1214 New Physics #1334 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Let me reverse the previous post so that the import, the meaning is

clear. That if you take the Maxwell Equations as the axioms over all

of physics, that you no longer can think about or having any meanful

concepts or ideas that are lower than the Maxwell Equations.

This is important, because all these ideas are then just fakeries of

physics:

a) quarks

b) black-holes

c) strings

d) Cooper pairing

e) phonons

f) Higgs boson

All of those are lower than the Maxwell Equations and thus are just

fantasy fiction.

For example, here are two axioms of mathematics,

one in number theory and one in geometry:

Natural Numbers Mathematical Induction axiom:

If M is a set of Natural Numbers and if it contains 1, and if we

suppose it contains k, and can thence show it contains k+1, then that

set is the set of all

Natural Numbers (with 0 appended).

Euclidean geometry Parallel axiom: given a line and a point not on the

line there is one and only one line through that point which is

parallel to the given line.

Now, may point or reasoning in displaying two axioms of mathematics,

is that in mathematics, mathematicians are not ignorant in wanting to

find a more primitive set of axioms.

But in Physics, where physicists have never before set up their

subject with axioms, then physicists have no guidance, no measure of

whether they are logical, and worst of all, they constantly keep

trying to lower themselves to more primitive terms and ideas.

For example, in Old Physics, they are not satisfied by saying the

proton is a ball, a tiny ball particle, and so they lower themselves

to dreaming up cranky and crackpot quarks. Some are not satisfied with

quarks and they dream up some more stupidity such as strings or

superstrings. With silly accessories such as phonons and other

nonsense, even Higgs boson is thrown in.

Now going back to the mathematician. How silly would it be to ask a

mathematician, "I am not satisfied with the axiom set of geometry, and

I want something lower than the point and line". What if I told the

mathematician I wanted a point to be composed of three quarks, or that

a line as we move along the line that it picks up Higgs boson and

becomes a "thicker line". So the reader can begin to understand that

in mathematics, where precision is demanded, that they must have axiom

sets, and those axioms cannot go lower, for they must be at rock

bottom foundation of mathematics.

Yet the physicists with their 20th century physics that never

pinpointed the axioms of physics:

4 Symmetrical Maxwell Equations plus all the facts of Chemistry, that

the physicists could never go below the Maxwell Equations in thought

or ideas, because those equations were the final rock bottom

foundation of physics.

So that when Dr. Chris talks about electrons stuck together by

gravity, he has failed to recognize the Maxwell Equations do not allow

that. Or when Murray Gell Man talks about quarks, he has failed to

understand the Maxwell Equations do not allow that. Or when Weinberg

talks about the Standard Model, he has failed to appreciate that the

Maxwell Equations do not support such a contraption, or when Peter

Higgs imagines the Higgs boson, that Peter has failed to understand

the Maxwell Equations as axioms never supported any of that pathetic

nonsense.

When mathematics has its axiom sets, it does not waste the time and

career of mathematicians trying to find more lower concepts than the

axioms. But when physics never states its axioms-- the Maxwell

Equations, then it is safe to say that over half the physicists waste

their time and their career on silly stupid concepts that are lower

than the Maxwell Equations.

Now I myself have wasted some time on looking for ideas that were

lower than the Maxwell Equations can bear, and so I also have made

silly comments. So I am also guilty of silliness.

--

Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-

bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and

fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium

http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium

whole entire Universe is just one big atom

where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies