Date: Feb 10, 2013 4:51 AM Author: email@example.com Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots On 9 Feb., 17:36, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > the arguments are yours
> > > and the statements are yours-
> > Of course. But the wrong interpretation is yours.
> How does one interpret
> we have shown m does not exist
> (your statement)
> to mean that
> m might still exist
TND is invalid in the infinite.