Date: Feb 10, 2013 4:51 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 9 Feb., 17:36, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > the arguments are yours
> > > and the statements are yours-
>
> > Of course. But the wrong interpretation is yours.
>
> How does one interpret
>    we have shown m does not exist
>    (your statement)
>
> to mean that
>
>    m might still exist
>
> ?

TND is invalid in the infinite.

Regards, WM