Date: Feb 10, 2013 4:05 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the root<br> s

On 2/10/2013 3:54 AM, WM wrote:
> On 9 Feb., 21:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>

>> What exceeds in length every fis is of not finite (infinite) length.
>
> In the list
>
> 1
> 11
> 111
> ...
>
> There is no FIS of the diagonal that is loinger than every line.
> For everey line, there is a longer FIS of the diagonal.
> For every FIS of the diagonal, there is a longer line.


And, so we see the confusion over the meaning
of singular term.

And, so we see the confusion over the meaning
of a definite article.

the diagonal is different from its proper parts.