Date: Feb 10, 2013 4:18 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 10 Feb., 22:05, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 2/10/2013 3:54 AM, WM wrote:
>

> > On 9 Feb., 21:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>
> >> What exceeds in length every fis is of not finite (infinite) length.
>
> > In the list
>
> > 1
> > 11
> > 111
> > ...

>
> > There is no FIS of the diagonal that is loinger than every line.
> > For everey line, there is a longer FIS of the diagonal.
> > For every FIS of the diagonal, there is a longer line.

>
> And, so we see the confusion over the meaning
> of singular term.
>
> And, so we see the confusion over the meaning
> of a definite article.
>
> the diagonal is different from its proper parts.


Please express the difference in digits.

Regards, WM