Date: Feb 10, 2013 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 9 Feb., 21:59, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > You have already agreed hat d is not actually infinite
> > When or where do you allege that I have done anything so foolish?
> Better ask when you have not. But I see that I erroneously assumed
> William had been the author.
WM's list of things that he erroneously assumes is as close to actually
infinite as he will ever get.