Date: Feb 10, 2013 4:57 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article 
<4106e64c-2623-467e-aa6b-1b343ffc24fa@h17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 9 Feb., 21:59, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>

> > > You have already agreed hat d is not actually infinite
> >
> > When or where do you allege that I have done anything so foolish?

>
> Better ask when you have not. But I see that I erroneously assumed
> William had been the author.
>

WM's list of things that he erroneously assumes is as close to actually
infinite as he will ever get.
--