Date: Feb 16, 2013 9:32 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Feb 16, 1:04 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 15 Feb., 23:58, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > So WMs statements are

>

> > there is a line l such that d and l

> > are coFIS

>

> Of course, for every n there is a line 1, 2, 3, ..., n that is coFIS

> to the diagonal 1, 2, 3, ..., n.

Nope. a line is either coFIS to d or it is not.

It makes sense to say

For every n there is a line, l(n) such that

the nth FIS of d.

But this does not make l(n) coFIS to d.

And there is not more than every n.

> > there is no line l such that d and l

> > are coFIS

> That would only be true if there was an n larger than every n

?? The statement is yours. Are you now withdrawing it.