Date: Feb 20, 2013 5:15 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 18 Feb., 14:11, William Hughes <> wrote:

> > Please answer as politely: Is there any n with no line containing
> > d_1, ..., d_n

> No.

Please answer without using phrases like "all" or "totality" or
"complete collection" or "whole class" or "finished infinite" or "the
set": Can you name a union of FISs of the diagonal that is missing in
every line of the list?

Regards, WM