Date: Feb 23, 2013 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
William Hughes <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Feb 23, 5:18 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > ======================
> > > Can you identify a FIS of d that is not in a line l of L?
> > No
> > > You cannot. Nevertheless d consists of FIS of lines of L, and of
> > > nothing else, by definition and by construction of d.
> > > Or do you object to this fact?
> > No.
> > ===============================
> > Why then are you raising the impression as if you were trying to argue
> > that d is not with *all its existence* in the lines of the list?
> I agree that d "with *all its existence*"
> is in the lines of the list.
> I do not agree that this means
> d with all its existence is in
> one line of the list.
WM's "d" is only "IN" the lines of the list if one can somehow include
some sort of union of all those lines as a line itself, which does not
work in my world of standard mathematics.
Note that in standard mathematics