Date: Feb 24, 2013 4:35 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article 
<fc045ff4-60b4-4e93-a086-afc3bd1b79c1@k4g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 24 Feb., 00:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 23, 5:18 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

> > > ======================
> >
> > > > Can you identify a FIS of d that is not in a line l of L?
> >
> > > No
> >
> > > > You cannot. Nevertheless d consists of FIS of lines of L, and of
> > > > nothing else, by definition and by construction of d.
> > > > Or do you object to this fact?

> >
> > > No.
> >
> > > ===============================
> >
> > > Why then are you raising the impression as if you were trying to argue
> > > that d is not with *all its existence* in the lines of the list?

> >
> > I agree that d "with *all its existence*"
> > is in the lines of the list.
> > I do not agree that this means
> > d with all its existence is in
> > one line of the list.-

>
> Remember: Potential infinity goes to every n, but not farther. And for
> every n d with all its existence is in line n of the list.


And for every line in the list, there are more FISs of d longer than
that line than as short as that line!

And for every line of length n, there is a FIS of d that is more than n
times as long as that line.
--