```Date: Feb 24, 2013 4:35 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article <fc045ff4-60b4-4e93-a086-afc3bd1b79c1@k4g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 24 Feb., 00:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> > On Feb 23, 5:18 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ======================> >> > > > Can you identify a FIS of d that is not in a line l of L?> >> > > No> >> > > > You cannot. Nevertheless d consists of FIS of lines of L, and of> > > > nothing else, by definition and by construction of d.> > > > Or do you object to this fact?> >> > > No.> >> > > ===============================> >> > > Why then are you raising the impression as if you were trying to argue> > > that d is not with *all its existence* in the lines of the list?> >> > I agree that d "with *all its existence*"> > is in the lines of the list.> > I do not agree that this means> > d with all its existence is in> > one line of the list.-> > Remember: Potential infinity goes to every n, but not farther. And for> every n d with all its existence is in line n of the list.And for every line in the list, there are more  FISs of d longer than that line than as short as that line!And for every line of length n, there is a FIS of d that is more than n times as long as that line.--
```