Date: Feb 25, 2013 11:44 PM
Author: namducnguyen
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the root<br> s

On 25/02/2013 11:20 AM, Frederick Williams wrote:
> Nam Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> On 23/02/2013 2:38 PM, Virgil wrote:

>>> In article
>>> <f3b2ce4b-c9ec-447f-92b4-47a07a2e2aac@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>,
>>> WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> In mathematics [...] proofs of existence do
>>> not always require that one find an example of the thing claimed to
>>> exist.

>>
>> So, how would one prove the existence of the infinite set of
>> counter examples of Goldbach Conjecture,

>
> Did you omit "supposing it is so" or something similar?


Right: it's an irrelevant omission.

>
>> given that it does not
>> "not [...] require that one find an example" of such existences?


--
----------------------------------------------------
There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.

NYOGEN SENZAKI
----------------------------------------------------