Date: Feb 25, 2013 11:44 PM
Author: namducnguyen
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the root<br> s
On 25/02/2013 11:20 AM, Frederick Williams wrote:

> Nam Nguyen wrote:

>>

>> On 23/02/2013 2:38 PM, Virgil wrote:

>>> In article

>>> <f3b2ce4b-c9ec-447f-92b4-47a07a2e2aac@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>,

>>> WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>> In mathematics [...] proofs of existence do

>>> not always require that one find an example of the thing claimed to

>>> exist.

>>

>> So, how would one prove the existence of the infinite set of

>> counter examples of Goldbach Conjecture,

>

> Did you omit "supposing it is so" or something similar?

Right: it's an irrelevant omission.

>

>> given that it does not

>> "not [...] require that one find an example" of such existences?

--

----------------------------------------------------

There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.

NYOGEN SENZAKI

----------------------------------------------------