Date: Feb 27, 2013 8:50 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On Feb 27, 1:04 pm, WM <> wrote:
> On 26 Feb., 22:54, William Hughes <> wrote:

> > Now no one can stop you using whatever
> > terminology you want.  However, do not
> > expect that you can use idiotic terminology
> > without being considered an idiot.

> But one can use such arguing without being considered as such?


> Remember: Your point of view requires, what you often have emphasized:
> There are all FIS of d in the list, but there is no line containing
> them. This implies that they are distributed among several lines

or that m, the index of line they are in is
a variable natural number and
that it is silly to
say that there is one line that contains
every FIS when this "one" line has a variable
as index.