Date: Feb 28, 2013 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 27 Feb., 21:50, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > Note, there is no "set |N" in potential infinity.
> > If one can distinguish natural numbers from things which are not natural
> > numbers WHY is there no set of all natural numbers
> Because natural numbers like all numbers are names created by thinking
> individuals. What has not been created is not there or somewhere else.
WM confuses those names with the things named.
One, two three, and so on, are names .
Ein, Zwei, Drei, und so weiter, are different names but name the same
> > Note that there is such a set everywhere else!
> Note that people have believed in witches with the same faithfulness.
No one burns sets at the stake.
> > > The
> > > "set |N" is an actual, i.e., completed infinity. But this assumption
> > > is contradicted (see below).
> > Not outside of WMYTHEOLOGY !
> In the list
> 1, 2
> 1, 2, 3
> there is nothing unless it is in one single line.
Then there is nothing because you did not put in it in a single line.
> >> Your LIST of lines is constructed so that there is no line containing
> > all the elements in all the lines,
> There is no "all"
There is outside Wolkenmuekenheim.