Date: Feb 28, 2013 4:14 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
In article

<52633848-6977-405f-961d-d9e08dbb4a38@a14g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 27 Feb., 21:50, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

>

> > > Note, there is no "set |N" in potential infinity.

> >

> > If one can distinguish natural numbers from things which are not natural

> > numbers WHY is there no set of all natural numbers

>

> Because natural numbers like all numbers are names created by thinking

> individuals. What has not been created is not there or somewhere else.

WM confuses those names with the things named.

One, two three, and so on, are names .

Ein, Zwei, Drei, und so weiter, are different names but name the same

things.

>

> >

> > Note that there is such a set everywhere else!

>

> Note that people have believed in witches with the same faithfulness.

No one burns sets at the stake.

> >

> > > The

> > > "set |N" is an actual, i.e., completed infinity. But this assumption

> > > is contradicted (see below).

> >

> > Not outside of WMYTHEOLOGY !

>

> In the list

> 1

> 1, 2

> 1, 2, 3

> ...

> there is nothing unless it is in one single line.

Then there is nothing because you did not put in it in a single line.

>

>

> >> Your LIST of lines is constructed so that there is no line containing

> > all the elements in all the lines,

>

> There is no "all"

There is outside Wolkenmuekenheim.

--