Date: Feb 28, 2013 4:14 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article 
<52633848-6977-405f-961d-d9e08dbb4a38@a14g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 27 Feb., 21:50, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>

> > > Note, there is no "set |N" in potential infinity.
> >
> > If one can distinguish natural numbers from things which are not natural
> > numbers WHY is there no set of all natural numbers

>
> Because natural numbers like all numbers are names created by thinking
> individuals. What has not been created is not there or somewhere else.


WM confuses those names with the things named.

One, two three, and so on, are names .

Ein, Zwei, Drei, und so weiter, are different names but name the same
things.
>
> >
> > Note that there is such a set everywhere else!

>
> Note that people have believed in witches with the same faithfulness.


No one burns sets at the stake.
> >
> > > The
> > > "set |N" is an actual, i.e., completed infinity. But this assumption
> > > is contradicted (see below).

> >
> > Not outside of WMYTHEOLOGY !

>
> In the list
> 1
> 1, 2
> 1, 2, 3
> ...
> there is nothing unless it is in one single line.


Then there is nothing because you did not put in it in a single line.
>
>

> >> Your LIST of lines is constructed so that there is no line containing
> > all the elements in all the lines,
>
> There is no "all"


There is outside Wolkenmuekenheim.
--