Date: Mar 3, 2013 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 3 Mrz., 11:37, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 11:22 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > On 3 Mrz., 00:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > But "there are all FIS" is not a contradiction, if they must be in
> > more than one line of a list that contains only lines that contain
> > everything that is in all preceding lines?
> > Amazing.
> The above just says that if there all all
> FIS then the list has no last line.
> Not Amazing.
The above may say what you like. It is provably false.
Why don't you simply try to find a potentially infinity set of natural
numbers (i.e. excluding matheological dogmas like "all prime numbers"
or "all even numbers") that is not in one single line? You will and
must fail. Therefore, with respect to natural numbers that can
individually be defined, you state a falsity.