Date: Mar 6, 2013 4:43 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
In article

<fd0fc507-a0ea-4e5b-bddd-2ac4e1af82f3@g16g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 5 Mrz., 22:40, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Mar 5, 9:53 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > > On 5 Mrz., 12:45, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > > > On Mar 5, 10:57 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >

> > > > > On 4 Mrz., 23:56, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Let K be a (possibly potentially infinite) set of

> > > > > > lines of L. Then

> >

> > > > > > Every FISON of d is in a findable line of K

> > > > > > iff K does not have a findable last line

> >

> > > > > No, false quote.

> >

> > > > What do you think this was a quote of?

> >

> > > One of my statements.

> >

> > Nope. This is my claim, put into the language we

> > have now developed. It is equivalent to saying

> > that L_m has no fixed maximum value, something we

> > both agree with.

> >

> > Indeed our argument is now only over language.

> > We both agree that the line L_m contains

> > every FIS of d, and that only L_m will do.

> > We only disagree about my claim that calling

> > L_m "a single line of the list" is silly.-

>

> L_m is a single line if m is a natural number.

But any such m. by reason of not being able to have a successor, cannot

be a natural.

> Would you prefer to call L_m infinitely many lines?

It is a "last line" in a list which does not have any last lines.

>

> But more important: you do no longer claim that the list can be

> completed and that larger infinities can exist?

Perhaps not in Wolkenmuekenheim, but infinities can and do exist outside

it.

--