Date: Mar 7, 2013 4:59 PM Author: William Hughes Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots On Mar 7, 9:39 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> To talk of d without further specification is silly.
WM: There does not exist
(in the sense of not findable)
a natural number m such that
the mth line of L is coFIS with
No mention of the state of d. So I guess
we can talk of whether d is coFIS with
a line without mentioning
the state of d.
Do you agree with the statement
g is not coFIS with d.