Date: Mar 7, 2013 4:59 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On Mar 7, 9:39 pm, WM <> wrote:

> To talk of d without further specification is silly.

WM: There does not exist
(in the sense of not findable)
a natural number m such that
the mth line of L is coFIS with

No mention of the state of d. So I guess
we can talk of whether d is coFIS with
a line without mentioning
the state of d.

Do you agree with the statement

     g is not coFIS with d.