Date: Mar 8, 2013 6:16 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 8 Mrz., 11:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

To make a change: Do *you* agree with the statement: It is silly to
claim the existence of a set of natural numbers that has no first
element?

Regards, WM