```Date: Mar 16, 2013 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

WM wrote:> On 16 Mrz., 19:26, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:>> On Mar 16, 7:10 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:>>>> > On 16 Mrz., 18:10, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:>>>> > > > Ok, I understand. Anyhow, if the number of lines is not empty, then>> > > > there must remain at least one line as a necessary line.>>>> > > Not a particular line.  This is similar to>> > > the case where any set of lines with an unfindable>> > > last line has at least one "necessary" findable line.>> > > This line has a line number in the original>> > > list but we can choose the  "necessary">> > > findable line to have any line number we want.>>>> > No, it is always the last line. We call it unfindable or unfixable>> > because as soon as we have found it, it is no longer the last line.>>>> Note, that I am not talking about the unfindable line,>> but the "necessary" findable line.  We can choose this>> line to have any line number we want> > In potential infinity there is no necessary line except the last one.> We know that with certainty from induction. Every found and fixed line> n cannot be necessary, because the next line contains it.> > Everything that is in the list> 1> 1, 2> 1, 2, 3> ...> 1, 2, 3, ..., n> is in the last line. Alas as soon as you try to fix it, it is no> longer the last line.> > Think of the time. What is "now"? As soon as you try to fix it, it is> past. In time you can predict the development of clocks. In lists> there is no such smooth, predictable evolution. Will the next line> added to above list be n+1, or n^2 or n^n^n^n (all those of course> also including n+1 and its followers? There are no limits. But as soon> as we look onto the last line, we get the idea of another one and that> will add one or many lines to the list.> > Regards, WMWill this braindead nonsense appear in the next "research report" of thatcrazy so-called "university" where you work as a stupefactor of thepitiable students?
```