Date: Mar 16, 2013 3:56 PM
Author: Ralf Bader
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
> On 16 Mrz., 19:26, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 16, 7:10 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>> > On 16 Mrz., 18:10, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > Ok, I understand. Anyhow, if the number of lines is not empty, then
>> > > > there must remain at least one line as a necessary line.
>> > > Not a particular line. This is similar to
>> > > the case where any set of lines with an unfindable
>> > > last line has at least one "necessary" findable line.
>> > > This line has a line number in the original
>> > > list but we can choose the "necessary"
>> > > findable line to have any line number we want.
>> > No, it is always the last line. We call it unfindable or unfixable
>> > because as soon as we have found it, it is no longer the last line.
>> Note, that I am not talking about the unfindable line,
>> but the "necessary" findable line. We can choose this
>> line to have any line number we want
> In potential infinity there is no necessary line except the last one.
> We know that with certainty from induction. Every found and fixed line
> n cannot be necessary, because the next line contains it.
> Everything that is in the list
> 1, 2
> 1, 2, 3
> 1, 2, 3, ..., n
> is in the last line. Alas as soon as you try to fix it, it is no
> longer the last line.
> Think of the time. What is "now"? As soon as you try to fix it, it is
> past. In time you can predict the development of clocks. In lists
> there is no such smooth, predictable evolution. Will the next line
> added to above list be n+1, or n^2 or n^n^n^n (all those of course
> also including n+1 and its followers? There are no limits. But as soon
> as we look onto the last line, we get the idea of another one and that
> will add one or many lines to the list.
> Regards, WM
Will this braindead nonsense appear in the next "research report" of that
crazy so-called "university" where you work as a stupefactor of the