Date: Mar 17, 2013 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/16/2013 4:37 PM, WM wrote:
> On 16 Mrz., 21:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>>> In potential infinity there is no necessary line except the last one.
>>> We know that with certainty from induction. Every found and fixed line
>>> n cannot be necessary, because the next line contains it.
>> AS soon as something is identifies as a natural or a FIS of the set of
>> naturals, it has a successor. It cannot be either a natural nor a FIS of
>> the naturals without a successor. at least by any standard definition of
> As soon as a second becomes presence, it has a successor.
And what fantasy is this?
The successor to the present has existential form but
has not yet happened.
That is not the Kantian aprioriticity of time.
That is not the Hegelian becoming of the present.
It is the unfounded object of unjustifiable belief.
It is the pot calling the kettle black.