Date: Mar 17, 2013 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 17 Mrz., 08:18, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 3/16/2013 4:37 PM, WM wrote:
> > On 16 Mrz., 21:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> >>> In potential infinity there is no necessary line except the last one.
> >>> We know that with certainty from induction. Every found and fixed line
> >>> n cannot be necessary, because the next line contains it.
> >> AS soon as something is identifies as a natural or a FIS of the set of
> >> naturals, it has a successor. It cannot be either a natural nor a FIS of
> >> the naturals without a successor. at least by any standard definition of
> >> naturals.
> > As soon as a second becomes presence, it has a successor.
> And what fantasy is this?
> The successor to the present has existential form but
> has not yet happened.
> That is not the Kantian aprioriticity of time.
> That is not the Hegelian becoming of the present.
> It is the unfounded object of unjustifiable belief.
It is the well known and established natural way how time passes and
how the system of human actions in time goes off.