Date: Mar 17, 2013 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/17/2013 4:13 AM, WM wrote:
> On 17 Mrz., 08:18, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>> On 3/16/2013 4:37 PM, WM wrote:
>>> On 16 Mrz., 21:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>>>>> In potential infinity there is no necessary line except the last one.
>>>>> We know that with certainty from induction. Every found and fixed line
>>>>> n cannot be necessary, because the next line contains it.
>>>> AS soon as something is identifies as a natural or a FIS of the set of
>>>> naturals, it has a successor. It cannot be either a natural nor a FIS of
>>>> the naturals without a successor. at least by any standard definition of
>>> As soon as a second becomes presence, it has a successor.
>> And what fantasy is this?
>> The successor to the present has existential form but
>> has not yet happened.
>> That is not the Kantian aprioriticity of time.
>> That is not the Hegelian becoming of the present.
>> It is the unfounded object of unjustifiable belief.
> It is the well known and established natural way how time passes and
> how the system of human actions in time goes off.
It is the unfounded object of unjustifiable belief.