Date: Mar 19, 2013 6:56 AM
Author: Alan Smaill
Subject: Re: Matheology § 223: AC and AMS
fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> writes:
> On 3/18/2013 5:22 PM, WM wrote:
>> That does not make the objects more abundant than the names. So there
>> is no problem.
> Objects you "know" through "proof by reality"?
> You understand nothing about the "names" of
> which you speak, or their relation to truth
while WM claims that proof by induction establishes results
beyond doubt, proving claims about entities that will never
exist in his view.
No, it doesn't make sense.