Date: Mar 19, 2013 6:56 AM
Author: Alan Smaill
Subject: Re: Matheology § 223: AC and AMS

fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> writes:

> On 3/18/2013 5:22 PM, WM wrote:
>> That does not make the objects more abundant than the names. So there
>> is no problem.

>
> Objects you "know" through "proof by reality"?
>
> You understand nothing about the "names" of
> which you speak, or their relation to truth
>
> http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/presupposition/#LocConDynTur


while WM claims that proof by induction establishes results
beyond doubt, proving claims about entities that will never
exist in his view.

No, it doesn't make sense.

--
Alan Smaill