Date: Mar 21, 2013 9:29 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On Mar 21, 2:11 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 21 Mrz., 14:02, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > In fact? That's amazing. So we cannot prove that all lines of the

> > > infinite set of lines are unnecessary?

>

> > We can prove that something is true for every

> > member of an infinite set. We cannot

> > prove that something is true for the set

> > itself unless the set is finite.

>

> But I am not interested in the set itself. Not at all! My claim is

> that every member of the set of lines can be removed

Yes, removed one at a time

>such that no member remains

nope, working one at a time you will not get

to the point that no member remains.