Date: Mar 21, 2013 9:29 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On Mar 21, 2:11 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 21 Mrz., 14:02, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In fact? That's amazing. So we cannot prove that all lines of the
> > > infinite set of lines are unnecessary?
> > We can prove that something is true for every
> > member of an infinite set. We cannot
> > prove that something is true for the set
> > itself unless the set is finite.
> But I am not interested in the set itself. Not at all! My claim is
> that every member of the set of lines can be removed
Yes, removed one at a time
>such that no member remains
nope, working one at a time you will not get
to the point that no member remains.