Date: Mar 24, 2013 10:27 AM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/24/2013 4:32 AM, WM wrote:
> On 24 Mrz., 03:01, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>

>> So the union of any non-empty but finite set of of FISONs is always a
>> FISON, but the union of any infinite set of FISONs is always |N, which
>> is not a FISON.

>
> And that is the foolish belief of matheologians, who are incapable of
> distinguishing the potentially infinite sequence of natural numbers


It shall be distinguished when it is
properly defined.

> from a completed actually infinite set |N that is more than every
> FISON.


Please define "more than" in a meaningful way for this
context.

> There is not the least reason to believe it

It is not about belief.

see "conceited reasoner"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxastic_logic#Types_of_reasoners

> (and there are many
> proofs of the contrary)


You have yet to formulate a proof of anything.

> but since once upon a time this confusion has
> occured, meanwhile there are thousands of believers. Probably it lies
> in the nature of humans to have at least some irrational items for
> their wish to believe.


It is not about belief. It is about being able to do
effective mathematics that may be applied to the
continuum.

Your theory of monotonic inclusive crayon marks just
does not seem to fit the bill.