Date: Mar 24, 2013 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 24 Mrz., 15:09, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 3/24/2013 4:13 AM, WM wrote:
> > On 23 Mrz., 23:36, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 23, 11:08 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >>> On 23 Mrz., 21:26, William hHughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> You claim that no finite line of the set changes the union.
> >> There is no single finite line such that the removal of this one line
> >> changes the union.
> > This holds for every line and all its predecessors, i.e., for the
> > whole potentially infinite set
> Not when you fail to define your terms.
Every definition needs words. Ignorant readers like you have a very
limited vocabulary only. But it would be too tedious to express myself
in such a primitive way as might be (but that's not sure)
understandable by you. Therefore, if you don't understand, stop
reading my texts.