Date: Mar 26, 2013 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 26 Mrz., 21:04, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > On 26 Mrz., 00:08, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > No. We deal with irrational numbers by using their names.
> > > We deal with ALL numbers by using various forms of their names.
> > And there are only countably many names that we can deal with.
> That only means that we cannot deal directly or individually with any of
> those many unnamed and unnameable real numbers. It does not mean that
> they are not there. That is a flaw in our language, not in the number
No it is the flaw in your brains.
Of course every proof and every Cantor list deliver one or more but at
most a countable set of named diagonals. Never has any proof shown an
uncountable real or given any hint to surmise that.