Date: Apr 4, 2013 8:56 PM Author: JT Subject: Re: Is there any webpage or math program that can write fracitons,<br> numbers into bijective enumeration? On 2 Apr, 17:29, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2 Apr, 16:47, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> > On 2 Apr, 13:51, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > On 2 Apr, 13:10, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > On 2 Apr, 13:05, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > > On 2 Apr, 12:59, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > > > On 31 mar, 23:11, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>

> > > > > > wrote:

>

> > > > > > > just pick a number, like "five,"

> > > > > > > and represent it in each of the bases, from -ten, down to

> > > > > > > the last possible "natural" digital representation,

> > > > > > > to see how it came-about, in the first place.

>

> > > > > > Bases of the naturals is due to partitioning of discrete entities, as

> > > > > > collections or sets if you so want, as you can understand the number

> > > > > > of embrasing parentheses signifies grouping and digit position it is

> > > > > > all very *basic*.

>

> > > > > > Counting 5={1,1,1,1,1}

> > > > > > Binary 5={{1,1}{1,1}1}

> > > > > > Ternary 5={{1,1,1}1,1}

> > > > > > Quaternary 5={{1,1,1,1}1}

> > > > > > Senary 5={1,1,1,1,1}

> > > > > > Septenary 5={1,1,1,1,1}

> > > > > > Octal 5={1,1,1,1,1}

> > > > > > Nonary 5={1,1,1,1,1}

> > > > > > Decimal 5={1,1,1,1,1}

>

> > > > > As you can see each digit position contain groups of the base. This is

> > > > > what numbers and the partitioning of the naturals really is about, the

> > > > > numberline is just a figment due to introduction of measuring, but

> > > > > numbers at base 1, the collection created by counting do not have

> > > > > geometric properties until you start partition the collection into a

> > > > > base.

>

> > > > A number as expressed using a base is a geometric perspective upon a

> > > > collecton of discrete entities. So depending upon if you use a

> > > > zeroless or a standard base the geometric properties change of the

> > > > collection. This is closely related to factoring.

>

> > > What is interesting but elementary when writing out a number into a

> > > base is to notice that every second digit plase is a square.

> > > Digit place ternary

> > > 1 3

> > > 2 9 square 3

> > > 3 27

> > > 4 81 square 9

> > > 5 243

> > > 6 729 square 27

> > > 7 2187

> > > 8 6561 square 81

>

> > > And this is the geometric properties of numbers lines building up

> > > squares, when you use zero in a base this you mash up all minor

> > > squares into a bigger.

> > > 70000000000000000000000000000000000700000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000900000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003

> > > is it prime?

> > > So the geometric properties using Nyan is totally different since each

> > > full base render a smaller square so the numbers become a sum of

> > > squares and their lines.

>

> > Decimal Termary

> > 6561 = 100000000

> > =(1*0)+(3*0)+(9*0)+(27*0)+(81*0)+(243*0)+(729*0)+(2187*0)+(6561*1)

>

> > It is easy to see the lack of decomposition and this of course grow

> > exponentially with digitplace.

> > And this is basicly why NyaN so much better when it comes to factor

> > primeproducts like RSA.

>

> > It seem like a webservice failure tohttp://www.anybase.co.nf/

>

> > But the code is available at my facebook page.http://www.facebook.com/jonas.thornvall

>

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5r_vHN_fkw

What happened Forrest