Date: Apr 12, 2013 2:39 AM
Author: Brian M. Scott
Subject: Re: Problems with Infinity?
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:50:47 -0600, Virgil
<email@example.com> wrote in
> In article
> Butch Malahide <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 8:49 pm, Quadibloc <jsav...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> However, there is a set known to have cardinality
>>> aleph-1, the set of well-orderings of the integers.
>> Well, sort of. Actually, the set of well-orderings of the
>> integers has the cardinality of the continuum, which may
>> or may not equal aleph_1. It's the set of *order types*
>> of well-orderings of the integers that absolutely has
>> cardinality aleph_1. That is, you definite an
>> equivalence relation on that set of well-orderings, two
>> orderings being called equivalent just in case they are
>> isomorphic, and the the resulting equivalence classes
>> are aleph_1 in number. (That's what you meant, but
>> mathematicians make a big deal of saying what you mean
>> and meaning what you say.)
> Which rules out WM.
Since I'm reading this in rasfw, would that by any chance be
the Augsburger Mücki-bot?