Date: Jun 19, 2013 5:02 AM
Author: Alan Smaill
Subject: Re: Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: derivative is inverse to integral #7 textbook 5th ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept

Nam Nguyen <> writes:

> On 17/06/2013 4:36 AM, Alan Smaill wrote:

[on the possibility that some members of the set {0,s(0),s(s(0)),...}
are not finite]

>> My debate with you does not depend on this being possible, however.
> I don't know what you're trying to say here.
> My statement here is that your constructed set:
> U = {0, s(0), s(s(0)), ... }
> could be uncountable and could contain elements that aren't finitely
> encoded.
> Do you accept or refute my statement here. If you refute, please note
> that I had a request (above):

For purposes of argument, I accept it.

My question to you is: is it possible that the set in question
contains only finite elements.

Do you accept or reject my statement here. If you reject,
please explain why.

Alan Smaill