```Date: Oct 31, 2013 10:17 AM
Author: Bart Goddard
Subject: Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0

Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote innews:142731ae-2284-4c30-99b2-b2a48cda088a@googlegroups.com: > On Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:01:05 AM UTC-4, Bart Goddard wrote:> >> >> mathematician knows exactly how to deal with 0^0.  > > > There does not appear to be any consensus, however. You, yourself have> admitted finding 0^0 to be ambiguous -- either 0 or 1 -- but, so far,> all we have from you is a bit of hand-waving. This is what you don't get, and you refuse to be taught:There IS consensus:  We all know that in different situations, one handles 0^0 differently.  You're "solution"is to do nothing.>> You've done nothing.> > On the contrary, I have presented a rigorous, mathematical basis,> complete with formal proofs, for dealing with the ambiguity of 0^0 No, you've presented nothing that deals with 0^0.  All ofyour statements are about nonzero bases, so 0^0 is notdealt with, it is simply ignored.  I.e., you've donenothing.
```