Date: Jan 17, 2014 11:05 PM
Author: David Bernier
Subject: Re: Help with a factorisation, Please [Important]

On 01/17/2014 10:55 AM, David Bernier wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 09:31 AM, Hlauk wrote:
>> On Friday, January 17, 2014 4:24:35 AM UTC-5, David Bernier wrote:
>>> On 01/17/2014 01:02 AM, Hlauk wrote:
>>>





>>>> As you will note I am just showing my pause points and not showing all the
>>>
>>>> iterations in between. I have become very used to doing this and will tackle
>>>
>>>> any large composite.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> How about the 130-digit composite number:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 47485133560063190433548259679204355907477810307482663990525310023918\
>>>
>>> 21388435849831808696657092215642611599144927466443608010614619 ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> dave

>>
>> Ok, I will get back to later on the above. I just got up and have to run an
>> errand.
>> What simple ratio would you like me to use between primes?
>> (1.25),(1.125),(1.0625),(1.1),(1.2),(1.05) or a more complex one?
>> Or I will just pick my own if you so wish.

>
> I propose a ratio of about 1.01 .
>
> dave
>
>


I've started CADO-NFS 2.0 with a Perl script assistant:

[david@localhost cado-nfs-2.0]$ ./factor.sh
4748513356006319043354825967920435590747781030748266399052531002391821388435849831808696657092215642611599144927466443608010614619
-pl


It could take a week or more, but it's a way of testing CADO-NFS 2.0
with perl scripts. The default Python scripts or script produces
errors.

dave


--
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/last_circle/1.htm